Arrest records

Get a mugshot off your search results

Mugshot sites exist to be paid for removal. Google knows that, and has a policy built specifically for it — which is the lever, rather than paying them.

How do you remove a mugshot from Google?

Google does not host mugshots; it indexes them from third-party sites, so the durable fix is removal at the source. Google will also de-index results under its policy on exploitative removal practices — sites that charge a fee to take a mugshot down — and will consider removal where charges were dropped or dismissed, where a record has been expunged or sealed, or where personal information such as a home address appears alongside the image.

Do not pay a mugshot site to remove your image. It funds the model, your record frequently reappears on a sister domain weeks later, and in several US states charging for removal is itself unlawful. Paying also undermines the exploitative-practices argument that would have removed it for free.

Grounds that work

  • The site charges a fee for removal — Google’s exploitative-practices policy
  • Charges were dropped, dismissed, or ended in acquittal
  • The record has been expunged or sealed by a court
  • The arrest concerned a minor
  • A home address, phone number or date of birth appears with the image
  • The original sheriff or court portal has itself taken the record down

How a mugshot case runs

  1. 1

    Full sweep

    We find every site carrying the image, not the two you have seen. These networks replicate aggressively and partial removal leaves the problem intact.

  2. 2

    Legal status

    Dismissal, acquittal, expungement or sealing documents. This is what turns a weak request into a strong one.

  3. 3

    Source removal

    Through each site’s own process where one exists that does not involve payment, and through the host or registrar where it does not.

  4. 4

    De-index filing

    Per URL, under the exploitative-practices policy or the personal-information policy, whichever fits.

  5. 5

    Monitoring

    Re-checked across the window. Mirror domains are the normal failure mode, and a reappearance inside the window is re-filed, not re-billed.

  6. 6

    Proof

    A dated screenshot per URL showing the result gone from a search for your name.

The specifics

Priced
Per URL, with a bundle rate for a full network sweep
Jurisdiction
Google’s exploitative-practices policy applies worldwide
Typical timeline
1 to 8 weeks per URL
Strongest document
An expungement or dismissal order
Counts as delivered
The URL no longer returns for searches of your name, evidenced by a dated screenshot

What we will not claim

  • We will not pay a mugshot site on your behalf. It funds the extortion, it invites a reappearance, and it weakens the policy argument that removes it for nothing.
  • Removal at the source beats de-indexing every time: it clears every search engine at once and it cannot be undone by a recrawl. We try the source first even when de-indexing is the cheaper job for us.
  • A current, unresolved case reported by a legitimate news outlet is not a mugshot-site problem and does not come down under this policy.
  • Google decides. We build the strongest documented request; nobody outside Google can force a result down, and anyone claiming a contact there is lying to you.

Questions

Last reviewed . Platform policies change; we re-check every page quarterly.